This is a statement by not-for-profit research institute REFSA (Research for Social Advancement) released on Thursday, 21 March 2013.
(Read Part 1 here)
The perception manipulation and deception surrounding the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) masks much more than the mediocre economic growth and dodgy math that we spotlighted yesterday. Today, we draw attention to 3 points:
If PEMANDU and the ETP were truly about transforming our nation for the better, there must be far more emphasis on improving education, skills and the social and business environment. They must also have the political will to combat grand corruption rather than just clear red tape and increase competition by dismantling monopolies which are controlled by political cronies.
Finally they must be honest and transparent about their achievements, rather than resort to manipulating statistics in order to deceive the public. Only then can we take real steps towards a future where all Malaysians can have the dignity of decent jobs, housing and security.
ETP Failed: Committed investments collapsed in 2012
The ETP experienced a spectacular reversal in its second full year of existence in 2012. The value of committed investments in 2012, their Gross National Income (GNI) impact and the number of jobs created collapsed compared to the previous year.
In simple terms, each Ringgit of committed investments in 2012 is expected to generate less GNI and create jobs that pay lower than the investments committed in 2011. The GNI for each job created by the 2012 committed investments is 83% lower at RM69,692 GNI per job in 2012 compared to RM412,761 in 2011. In terms of capital intensity, the investments per job fell 41% from RM571,172 in 2011 to RM338,958 in 2012.
Table 1: Committed Investments, GNI Impact in 2020 and number of jobs created from Entry Point Projects collapsed in 2012
|GNI in 2020||RM129.5b||RM6.6b||RM136.1b||-122.9||-95%|
Source: Exhibit E, 2012 ETP Annual Report
ETP failed: What happened to the shovel-ready projects?
Repeating the experience of 2011, the 2012 ETP Annual Report also avoided stating the amount of actual investments compared to committed investments. In our earlier critiques, we called out PEMANDU  for failing to declare in its 2011 ETP Annual Report that actual investments in 2011 was only RM12.9b. This is a mere 7% of the committed RM179b .
The 2012 ETP Annual Report is no different. It leaves us all in the dark as to how much of the committed investments from the 2011 as well as 2012 have actually been invested. Any reasonable Malaysian would expect to see a large amount of actual investments in 2012 from the RM179b committed by 2011 Entry Point Projects (EPPs). They have had a whole year or more to be rolled out, and would have had the help of PEMANDU cutting red tape and fast tracking processes.
The 2012 ETP Annual Report also fails to state the breakdown of investments between the public (government) and private sector. This information is important as a major target of the ETP is to have the private sector contribute 92% of the investment necessary to drive the ETP.
The miserable investment, GNI impact and job figures for 2012 coupled with the absence of disclosure on the amount of actual investments and the public-private breakdown suggests the following logical conclusions:
The 2012 ETP Annual Report attempts to skirt the issue by saying that many of the EPPs were front-loaded . However, even on that basis, the RM211.3b of total investments for 2011 and 2012 is nearly RM30b short of the RM240b for two years originally targeted by the ETP .
Further evidence of the failure of 2011 EPPs to take off is the fact that the 2012 ETP Annual Report could only highlight the completion of a RM4.9m new restaurant for the RM9.6b Karambunai Integrated Resort City. The absence of any news on the RM3 billion Tanjong Agas Oil & Gas and Logistics Industrial Park in Pahang also points to the possibility that this massive EPP has grounded to a halt. Incidentally, these are two projects which we highlighted as ‘dodgy’ EPPs as far back as February 2012 .
ETP Failed: More Malaysians qualify for BR1M payments than before
Ironically, it is another so-called ‘achievement’ of PEMANDU which strips bare the total failure of the ETP in terms of sustainably raising the incomes of those at the bottom of the economic ladder. When launching the ETP, PEMANDU said, “A key focus will be on ensuring that substantial improvements are made for people with the lowest household incomes. ”
Sadly, PEMANDU’s approach has been mega contracts for the big boys, while placating poor Malaysians with crumbs that momentarily lift their incomes. The number of Malaysians eligible for welfare has been steadily increasing under PEMANDU’s tenure. It was originally estimated that only 3.4m households comprising 53% of total households in Malaysia earned less than the RM3,000 per month threshold for entitlement to the RM500 Bantuan Rakyat 1 Malaysia (BR1M) handout . But ultimately, approximately 4.2 million applications were approved which resulted in RM2.1b being paid instead of the originally anticipated RM1.8b. Under the latest BR1M 2.0, which also includes individuals earning less than RM2000 per month, a total of 6.1m applications have been approved .
If GNI per capita has indeed soared 48.8% in two years as PEMANDU claims, why has the number of Malaysians who are eligible for welfare handouts increased rather than decreased? Over 20 million Malaysians, or nearly 70% of our population are on welfare while PEMANDU trumpets projects and investments under the ETP.
ETP Failed: To Transform Malaysia
The ETP Annual Reports and publicity focusing on investments, projects and US$ income proves our view that the ETP is only there to help the ‘big boys’ who can lobby PEMANDU to fast track their projects, as opposed to measures that help ordinary Malaysians sustainably improve their livelihoods .
If PEMANDU and the ETP were truly about transforming our nation for the better, there must be far more emphasis on improving education, skills and the social and business environment. They must also have the political will to combat grand corruption rather than just clear red tape and increase competition by dismantling monopolies which are controlled by political cronies. Finally they must be honest and transparent about their achievements rather than resort to manipulating statistics in order to deceive the public. Only then can we take real steps towards a future where all Malaysians can have the dignity of decent jobs, housing and security.
Teh Chi-Chang, CFA Dr. Ong Kian Ming BSc (LSE), MPhil (Cantab), PhD (Duke)
Executive Director Visiting Contributor
[email protected] [email protected]
 The acronym that the Performance Management and Delivery Unit within the prime minister’s department is better known by. PEMANDU is the government agency that created and is now steering the ETP.
 Covered in Part 3 of our series Dissecting the ETP Annual Report: It was only RM12.9 billion of ACTUAL investment. Available at www.refsa.org.
 Pg.10, 2012 ETP Annual Report
 The ETP calls for investments of RM120 billion per year. Pg.20 of ETP – A Roadmap for Malaysia Report.
 Covered in our Focus Paper A Critique of the ETP (Part 3(iii)) – Doubtful EPPs; doubtful achievements and due diligence. Available at www.refsa.org
 Pg. 60 of the ‘ETP – A Roadmap for Malaysia’ report
 pg 35, 2012 Budget speech by Finance Minister and Prime Minister Dato Sri Najib Razak.
 Covered in our Focus Paper A Critique of the ETP (Part 3(i)) – PEMANDU strengthens the ‘know-who’ cancer and also in Part 5 of our series Dissecting the ETP Annual Report, The EPPs do not seem to be creating high-income jobs. Available at www.refsa.org
Download PDF version here
[Image source: Chart – guitargoa/sxc.hu, car – buckey/sxc.hu]
Click here for more REFSA Says articles.
Visit us at http://refsa.org | Like us on our Facebook page | Follow our tweets @inforefsa